Pur Sang Bugatti: A Thoroughbred Reproduction Of The Most Successful Racing Car Of All Time

A vintage racing sanctioning body should consider a Pur Sang racing series for current and future owners. Perhaps an owner will organize an informal championship among owners around the globe.

U.S. is the biggest market by far, but Pur Sang has sold cars in China, Hong Kong, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Australia, Indonesia, Europe and the U.K.

Shatterproof aviation goggles and a cap are highly advisable, the driver’s face exposed like on a motorcycle, or in a World War One fighter plane.


 
“You drive today’s sports cars, super cars, and 100 miles per hour feels like 50. In our car, it’s the opposite. Inverse correlation—50 miles an hour feels like 100, or more. When you drive a car like ours, you’re part of the machine, connected to it,” says John Bothwell, the Californian who is leading his company Pur Sang into the 21st Century. “It’s like playing the violin compared to exploring tracks on an iPhone.”

Rear bodywork can be scalloped to move the driver back, adding legroom.

“That’s something a lot of young people who have the means to buy an original Bugatti for several million dollars, or buy a car like this, have never experienced,” says Bothwell. “All they know are contemporary supercars. Unlike most other cars 90 years ago, Bugatti Type 35s were light, agile, and nimble. Bugatti was far ahead of his time.” Pur Sang was Ettore Bugatti’s term, meaning thoroughbred or “pure blood.”

Forged hollow front axle reduces unsprung weight. The first aluminum alloy wheels on a car. Cockpit is narrow, the bodywork a slender fuselage. No modern car so totally incorporates man into the machine.  

Built in Molsheim, Alsace, Ettore Bugatti’s diminutive masterpiece racked up nearly 2000 victories in the late 1920s, making it arguably the most successful racing car of all time. Type 35s won the Targa Florio road race in Sicily five times in a row, and the Monaco Grand Prix twice. Excepting the success of Bentleys at Le Mans in the same period, Bugattis dominated racing until arrival of the Vittoria Jano-engineered Alfa Romeos.

 Displacement is a modest 2.3-liters, comparable to a modern 4-cylinder in a compact car. But eight cylinders in a row produces a gorgeous exhaust manifold, a wind section that delivers a unique symphony.

Like the original, Pur Sang’s meticulously accurate reproduction weighs only 1500 pounds—830 pounds lighter than the current Miata and roughly half the weight of supercars from Ferrari, McLaren, Lamborghini and Porsche. Pur Sang’s Type 35 delivers an exhilarating experience indistinguishable from an original, its 150-horsepower 2.3-liter supercharged straight-eight engine cracking the air with a vicious, distinctive bark.

The only cars that even remotely approximate the experience are a Caterham 7 or a Morgan Trike, but they were originally low-cost cars (the Morgan was licensed as a motorcycle) with prosaic engines, not a finely crafted thoroughbred with a
 
For mental calculation, a current supercar is roughly twice the weight of a Pur Sang Type 35, though of course they also have four, five and even six times the horsepower, with traction and stability control to put all that power on the ground. The two approaches and resulting experiences could not be more different, like comparing a World War One fighter plane with an F-22 Raptor.

2.3-liter straight eight, single overhead camshaft. Lower half of the engine is a stressed structural member in the car, as per Ettore’s design.

“My youngest client is about 30 years old. Saudi guy. He has every supercar known to man and he bought one of these compulsively, not knowing what he was getting into,” says Bothwell. “He said to me, ‘Where has this shit been all my life?’ It’s that proselytizing, getting people behind the wheel and letting them experience another dimension that has brought success. We have expanded to sales in 20 countries. Our workforce has gone from 30 guys to 100, full-time.”

Pur Sang’s work force is a gift of Argentina’s protectionist economic policies and an apprenticeship culture straight out of 19th Century central Europe. While restoring an original Type 35, Bothwell’s partner Jorge Anadon could not resist measuring all the key components to build an exact reproduction for himself. Anadon later set up Pur Sang in Parana, a town north of Buenos Aires. Pur Sang’s craftsmen can bend, shape, cast, chisel and forge any needed component.

A very tight cockpit. Pur Sang will scallop the rear cowl bodywork to move the driver's seat back slight, but this is no place for tall athletes, or any tall person for that matter.

Bothwell has sold about 150 Pur Sang cars, most of them Type 35 reproductions like the one I experienced. He plans to spend the rest of his working life introducing young enthusiasts to this pure blooded, thoroughbred driving experience, this ancient passion. Due to the talented work force, Bothwell now offers reproductions of Jano-era Alfa Romeos and the more civilized and roomier Bugatti Type 55. Using both the craftsmen in Argentina where the company was originally founded plus considerable talent added in recent years here in California, Pur Sang can recreate almost anything, from 1890s motorized buggies to 1950s sports cars. Pur Sang accepts one-off commissions, though the words of a friend and colleague, a semi-retired chief engineer who has created high-performance cars, should be considered: You can make any car once, and it costs at least a million dollars.

Behind the replica of an original magneto is a totally reliable modern electronic ignition.

“‘Replica’ usually means a crappy car for the guy who cannot afford the original,” says Bothwell. “But with our cars, they are in a league of their own, and our clientele can afford the original or in fact own the original.” One should not confuse a Pur Sang with a VW Beetle-based “Bugatti” replica of the 1970s.

“The original Type 35 works so well that after a test drive people assume we have cheated on the original design, and we have not. Ettore Bugatti got it right in the Twenties. We have only adopted a few updates that are commonly used by most owners of the original cars.” Pur Sang engines are virtually identical to the originals, such that owners of the Molsheim cars often substitute Pur Sang engines when they plan to campaign a real Type 35 hard in vintage racing or rallying.

Driving moccasins are recommended, and small feet help. The definition of intimate. Gearbox is sited along your left thigh. Note tiny pedals, and the machine-turned dash panel, a Bugatti design signature.

A client can choose to include modern enhancements that improve reliability without compromising the authenticity of the experience. “Our first engines all had roller bearing crankshafts, and it was the clients who said, ‘I don’t want to deal with that pain in the ass anymore.’ The guys who are critical of our plain-bearing engines are usually guys who have never owned one of the originals and they are idealizing. But the guys who are buying don’t want the hassle,” says Bothwell. Due to complexity and inherent fragility, roller bearing crankshafts often require rebuilds in five or six thousand miles, at considerable cost, and the difference in performance or visceral experience is imperceptible, virtually nil. Better to have the car on the road than in a shop torn apart.

Chain and sprocket are part of ingenious Ettore Bugatti design that balances braking force front to rear. A similar system balances brake force side to side. Effective braking and light weight were keys to the Type 35’s astonishing success 90 years ago.

Other differences are commonly adopted in most original Bugattis. “These so-called ‘cheats’ when it comes to the original design are miniscule in the overall scope of the car,” says Bothwell. Ignition is a reliable modern system from a V8 pickup truck dressed to resemble a 1920s Bosch magneto. Pur Sang packages a radiator fan to cool the engine in everyday traffic, expanding the car’s utility for pleasure drives. If a client wants an original-style three-lobe supercharger, OK. Or, one can opt for a simpler and more reliable two-lobe supercharger that looks the same.

My own photo the day or my visit. Bothwell had a Model T speedster sitting in the parking area.

Beyond using the excellent metals of our age, the only other major option is one even Ettore Bugatti eventually adopted when he finally realized his mathematical error: a proper firing order for a straight-eight engine, which helps long-term durability and reliability without effecting the engine’s symphony. No Bugatti owner will bat an eye at these invisible changes that greatly enhance reliability and lower operating costs.

The definition of intimate. Gearbox is sited along your left thigh. Note tiny pedals, and the machine-turned dash panel, a Bugatti design signature.

The result is a car I’d love to find parked in the garden of my happy acre. Remember that heart-in-mouth sensation when as a child you rode a bicycle down a steep hill for the first time, nervous system sparking, as alive as you’ve ever felt? That’s the feeling a Pur Sang Type 35 brings hustling through a corner, straight eight ripping the air, and an incomparable view down the delicate little hood to two tall, skinny wheels.

Subjective proof of Pur Sang authenticity? Two direct descendants of Ettore Bugatti own Pur Sang Type 35s. Michel Bugatti is Ettore Bugatti’s son, his only living offspring. He and his daughter, Caroline Bugatti, each own a Pur Sang. No greater endorsement exists for the authenticity of the engineering, build quality and driving experience of a Pur Sang Type 35.

 Note that drum brake is integral with alloy wheel. Wheel spokes help cool the brakes. They’re reliable and surprisingly effective, in part because there is so little mass to slow down.

Concours Country Club At Opa Locka Airport

“When we decided to build Concours Club, we brought our real estate developer’s skillset and our racing mindset,” says Neil Gehani, Chairman of Trilogy Real Estate Group and the force behind Concours Club, a new state-of-the-art automotive country club built between runways of Miami-Opa Locka Airport in the heart of urban Miami.

“A number of people have tried to crack the code in Miami,” says Gehani, who is currently leading the points for the Ferrari Challenge race series, and preparing for the Finale Mondiali this month at the Mugello circuit in Tuscany. “I was told it cannot be done—there’s no land, zoning is difficult.”

“We are seven miles north of Miami International, 15 minutes south of Ft. Lauderdale, 14 miles from Miami Beach,” says Gehani. “Miami-Opa Locka has three FBOs [fixed base operators]. Atlantic just bought a Ryan JetCenter built for $98 million. Hotel Fontainebleau is there, built by the Soffer family,” says Gehani. “We got it zoned for a high-end auto country club with a 60-year lease.” 

”Miami has often been where the biggest ambitions come to die,” Gehani says. “We don’t want to be another of those deals that was advertised and never happened. We did not market until we were almost 70 percent done with first-phase construction [of the track].” In that first round, 40 founding memberships sold out, raising $14 million.

Among those founding members is 3-time Indy 500 winner and longtime Miami resident Hélio Castroneves. “When Neil came to me with the idea of a race track in between Miami and Ft. Lauderdale, I thought ‘This is going to be a great opportunity.’ I don’t have a workshop or someplace to go when I finally hang up my racing shoes. I can drive here,” says Castroneves with a laugh. When asked how he felt about serving as the digital measuring stick for lap times and method through every single corner, Castroneves chuckles again and says, “Well, you have friends who talk trash and I can say ‘Well, all right. Let’s prove it.’” Castroneves also provided input on track configuration.

With the 2-mile track completed and the clubhouse and related command-control buildings in final stages, a second round of marketing will offer 100 “Elite” memberships by year’s end.

“Everyone else looked at the outskirts,” says Gehani, who turned that thought process inside-out. “We can rely on local hotels, local food and beverage suppliers, professionals and service industry that live minutes away from the project. If you’re 90 miles away from a city, you just can’t find people who have those skillsets.”

Gehani, whose first sports car was a Porsche 911 purchased in his late twenties with profits from a real estate project, is lifting a page from Porsche’s own real estate development playbook: don’t force people to travel to a remote racetrack built in a cow pasture or bean field; instead, bring a racetrack to a densely populated area. Porsche’s two North American Experience Centers are in densely populated urban areas built on reclaimed post-industrial land, near major international airports and have significant highway traffic flow just minutes away.

Concours Club incorporates “the sum of all wisdom for a road course,” says Aaron Weiss, President of Concours Club. Weiss is one of Gehani’s most important hires. His CV includes stints as President and COO of Moroso Motorsports Park in Florida, and also Executive V.P. of New York’s premiere private racing club, Monticello Motor Club. When the economy turned ugly in 2009, Weiss founded Sim-Sport.Net and in partnership with Speedsource manufactured high-end realistic simulator controls.

“We looked at all the current equipment through the lens of a private club with students looking to improve their skills,” says Weiss, who engaged the finest suppliers in North America and Europe to design and build not only the physical track itself, but just as importantly the electronics and command-control systems that are integral to contemporary racing.

“I’ve been on a quest to eliminate right-seat coaching. It’s a risk to the guy in the right seat, and a 175-pound instructor makes a huge difference in the car’s handling,” says Weiss. He hired GPX Labs, the simulator company of long-time racer Jeff Segal, to adapt their GPX Stream software system, which has been used in Ferrari Challenge for the past two seasons. GPX Stream takes real-time data from a car and delivers it instantaneously to a trackside coach.

“There’s a camera in the car, and equipment that integrates data coming from the CAN bus [the car’s electronic systems]. You can see in one quick image steering input, brake pedal pressure, throttle position. GPX Stream feeds that to any screen in our network. All of our fleet cars will be outfitted, and members’ cars if they want it. Your coach is on pitwall, in one of our buildings, almost anywhere in the world, and they can communicate in your ear just like in normal driver-to-pit communications,” says Weiss. In other words, a talented coach is analyzing your method and feeding input to your earpiece, rather than shouting and gesticulating from the passenger seat. “Now the historical data we have been analyzing for years and using in simulators becomes real-time. The instructor can say ‘You turned in late for this corner last lap so get down to the marks…try earlier, try later.’”

Gehani brought Castroneves in as a founding member, not only for cachet and marketing power in Miami and the greater racing community, but also to feed the data base, to serve as one hell of a measuring stick and learning tool. “If you’ve driven a fleet car and want to compare with Hélio, your lap data can be overlaid,” says Weiss. “If you want to see what Hélio does in any corner or complex on the circuit, I can send that stream right to any iPad, laptop, or screen in the facility.” Coaches can superimpose video of a member’s path through a corner over that of Hélio, showing the differences in approach, arc, exit. “I can show you where you turned in, where Hélio turned in. Analysis is fairly exact.”

And then there is control of flow on the course. “I have a control room. We can capture data, move data around, and control the entire race course,” says Weiss. “We are working with Racetrack Engineering, which runs the cameras and replays for Indianapolis, and also the Formula One U.S. Grand Prix at COTA [Circuit of the Americas in Austin, Texas]. The track is saturated with PTZ cameras [Pan-Tilt-Zoom] and electronic flag panels. Peppered around the track are individual server stations called Trackside Racks, or TSRs. We also have the track covered with ‘MyLaps’ timing groups. We have used these to create multiple shorter segments.” All this technology allows Concours Club to run the course without the burden of corner workers. Beyond payroll savings, that means it is very easy to set up the track for a member on-demand, when they want it, with no need to assemble a supporting cast of characters.

The technology also makes the track safer and easier to manage. “Tracks have segments, one, two, three,” says Weiss, referring to the three timed segments often shown in television coverage of Formula One races. “But what if you had a 2-mile track like ours with 20 segments? Now, each segment is a corner, or a complex of corners. If a car spins or wobbles, if it does not complete a segment in the expected amount of time, trackside lighting goes yellow. The software system will aim a camera at the zone and notify an operator to look closely for an anomaly. If the driver simply went wide and is still going, we turn the yellow off. If there is an off or an incident, yellows go up.”

And then there’s ease of use. “Paddocks accommodate members arriving at any time, without crossing the track. We have two paddocks and pitlanes. One for members, the other for events staged by manufacturers,” says Weiss. “The track runs in three 4-hour shifts. We can always ensure that members have daily access even if non-member events are scheduled for one or two of our slots.” In other words, that Lamborghini, Porsche or Ferrari event for journalists or potential owners will not interfere with playtime for members.

“We are not a strategic branded facility,” says Gehani. “We want to be Switzerland.” Several premiere brands have asked to stage events at Concours Club, “but we have politely declined for now,” says Gehani. Clearly, Gehani knows the track will prove irresistible to performance car manufacturers wanting to reach the wealthy of South Florida.

Concours Club is first and foremost a private club and learning tool for gentlemen racers. “We have a large irrigated concrete skidpad with a pitch to a center drain,” says Weiss. “The irrigation system is comparable to those used in all the BMW Performance Centers.” Gehani and Weiss looked at a kickplate, like those at the Porsche Experience Centers, but in truth these systems demonstrate stability control systems. As is so often the case, the old ways are often the best, and a wet skidpad is the best place to learn the fundamentals of car control, sliding across a safely controlled environment.

Gehani has financed the project almost entirely on his own, retaining clear majority ownership and thus control and direction. “We we are investing the capital required to build the garages and plan on offering the option of renting rather than requiring members to buy real estate. Concours Club is well capitalized and focused on delivering what we think our clients will prefer. Clients will have options to rent or buy, but we don’t have to pre-sell anything to build.”

This approach adds flexibility. A member with children and grandchildren who love racing might use the club for decades, or lose interest in five years. Renting means the member leaving the club is not left with an expensive “Garage-Majal” townhouse in a remote location, with nothing but farms or desert nearby. In such a dense urban area, reselling garage space should not prove difficult.

“In 2015 I was visiting Miami to avoid a ‘polar vortex’ in the upper Midwest,” says Gehani, who will soon leave his home in Chicago to permanently relocate to Miami. “I saw every sort of Ferrari, Lamborghini, Porsche…all these sports cars. I was wondering ‘Why is there nothing comparable to the Autobahn country club in Joliete where I first started racing? Look at Miami’s car culture, the international culture, Formula One is coming. They have Indy car races. And at that moment I told myself ‘I’m going to build one of these clubs.’ Who ever thought we could pull this off at a private airport? But we did.”

Speed, Sound and Fury: Road Testing The Track Car That Saves McLaren

Photos Courtesy McLaren Cars, and SHot by Mark Ewing

Our test car had the optional carbon-fiber roof panel, to help lower center of gravity.
McLaren 675LT

Two hours after the $395,271 Green Monster arrived in my garden, I was presenting it to a former colleague and old friend, a retired professional driver who has pounded all manner of cars down drag strips and around road courses. After a rolling start blitz up a long freeway onramp, he shouted out a string of expletive deletives, followed by, “This must be a ten-second car!”

Outside the U.S., McLaren offers a factory-installed Titanium roll cage. Installing a roll cage into a U.S.-delivery 675LT post-sale should pose little trouble for a McLaren service center or a serious operation that race-preps vintage cars.
The low cowl brings a classic Le Mans prototype sensation. When I drove the 650 S I said it felt like sitting in a chair between the fender crests. It's in part because your ankles are right next to the front hubs. That nearness brings communication only a rare few cars achieve.

That seat-of-the-pants estimate is accurate. In less than eight seconds the lightweight 675LT “Longtail” is thundering past 125 mph. It’s reasonable to assume 675LT covers the quarter-mile in the low ten-second range; it’s pushing only a few ounces more than four pounds per each of its 666 horsepower. From 50 or 60 mph to any speed I dare not admit, giving it full throttle is like sparking up a rocket strapped to your back. Along with the Ferrari 488GTB I drove over Monterey weekend last August, 675LT is the quickest factory-built road car I’ve experienced.

McLaren reps very nearly taunt people to engage Launch Control, as the 7-speed gearbox and its clutches are engineered to withstand repeated abuse. Puttering in traffic under light throttle, shifts are not quite as smooth as in the gold standard of imperceptible shifting, the Lamborghini Huracán. Launch 675LT full steam ahead and shift action is quick and affirmative.

Titanium exhaust pipes add to the gutty song.
A McLaren photo here, but it captures the tires spinning. Once you’ve felt it, laughing away, you will want it every time you’re behind the wheel.

In TRACK mode, 675LT can light up the rear tires when shifting into second gear under full throttle. Engine sounds are not soaring and operatic like in a Ferrari—no one matches Ferrari for screaming sound—but 675LT’s engine and exhaust speak to McLaren’s ancient source DNA, from 45 and 50 years ago when McLaren made its name, dominating the original Can-Am series with 700+ horsepower sports-prototypes. Understanding that how we measure and rate horsepower has grown much stricter, it’s interesting to think 675LT has power roughly comparable to the insanely radical Can-Am McLaren show below. Above 5000 rpm, 675LT’s engine sounds shatter the air, revs climbing almost faster than one can pull the trigger for a higher gear. Longtail has its own booming, raucous song.

 The rear paddle (the spoiler) is like the hand of God when it rises under braking. You feel its effects in the pit of your stomach. It’s real, it’s effective, and it takes up the rearview mirror when it rises. Real drama.

Beyond mind-bending acceleration from any speed to any other speed, what impressed most was Longtail’s civilized ride quality, unexpected and appreciated in an ostensibly track-focused car that many owners will have as part of a collection, and drive now and then on the road. Unlike poorly calibrated and therefore harsh sports cars like the Alfa Romeo 4C, McLaren’s suspension delivers a surprisingly supple ride over a wide range of road surfaces. Yes, it’s busy over grooved freeways, with tires grumbling and expansion joints, patches and bumps making themselves known, but an owner in Malibu or Pasadena can enjoy a weekend trip to Santa Barbara and not be frazzled upon arrival, or suffer an irate companion. Longtail performs ably on road and track.

McLaren’s boomerang corporate symbol is repeated in the design of the headlights. The front-end lift system is excellent, the carbon-fiber aero pieces never scuffing, even on my steep drive entrance.

On the creamy asphalt typical of California mountain two-lanes, 675LT glides, the ride quite good, leaving one to focus on driving quickly without physical suffering. It’s not a Rolls, but a one- or two-hour blast will prove enjoyable, though a breakfast stop appeals after 90 minutes in the saddle, to savor the experience with a cup of coffee just after dawn.

Rear three-quarters is the car’s best view. Seen in the broad side mirrors, the rear fenders are a view to remember.

675LT has light steering. Not because it’s over-boosted and thus lacking feel, but because little more than 42 percent of the car’s weight sits on the 235/35-19 Pirelli Trofeo front tires. Steering is communicative yet free of shock, like in a Lotus, which is high praise. Much about 675LT’s suspension and steering is based on lessons learned with the P1 hybrid supercar. If the English deliver a secret sauce, it’s steering and chassis. Longtail steering is artful, encouraging the driver to be subtle and gentle amidst sound, speed and fury, necessitating a serenely Zen presence of mind. For a short section, I pushed the transmission into neutral and coasted down a steep section of mountain with long, open bends. Longtail’s ride was smooth, with little suspension noise, and the steering was truly something to remember. It made a fine Soapbox Derby car.

Without the densely padded power seat of the 650S, which limits room and thus comfort for anyone much over five foot ten, the cockpit suddenly becomes a driver’s paradise even for big oafs like me. I did not slide the seat back all the way to the stops, and had several inches of headroom. High-sided and thinly padded racing buckets are not for all-day comfort, but they allow tall guys to fit the car.

Carbon brakes measure 15.5 inches at the front. On the road, you’re never without far more braking ability than you need. These are for the track, but once warmed up they provide stomach-bending capability from high speeds. 

My old chums who sampled early McLarens four years ago did not like the mouse fur carpeting; they will be pleased to find composite footwells with tidy snap-on mats. Excepting ten minutes in the garden to fiddle with buttons and explore track-day lap-recording functions, I never turned on the Meridien audio system. If you must, plug in an iPhone for mood music on that weekend drive from the Bay area to a Sonoma Coast B&B.

We had no place to safely replicate this demonstration of tire shredding. A very expensive demonstration this would be. Tires are Pirelli Trofeos, measuring 235/35-19 up front and 305/30-20s at the rear.

For 2016, McLaren shifts marketing emphasis to the 570S, to establish it as the kinky English alternative to a Porsche 911 Turbo S, Lamborghini Huracán, and a heavily optioned Mercedes-AMG GT S. Coming out of the stratosphere where there’s plenty of market white space, McLaren will have its work cut out against the Germans. Running parallel to 570S market launch, McLaren will probably develop a successor to 675LT, but its arrival will be timed so a new car does not bludgeon value of the LTs already built.

Considering the 1000 675LTs in coupe and spider form represent at least $800 million in sales revenue, and McLaren has gained what I can only assume are 1000 happy clients, “Longtail” is a golden goose McLaren should protect, not oversell. With demand for 675LT so high—the second batch of 500, in open spider bodywork, sold out in two weeks—675LT will join the P1 as a 21st Century McLaren that resists massive depreciation with unhappiness among owners. The 570S will be leased, a wise financial safety net under early adopters.

McLaren 675LT

Thanks mostly to P1, in 2014 McLaren earned roughly $30 million in profit, a small figure compared with the hundreds of millions Ferrari and Porsche generate each year, but start-up McLaren Automotive has a floor beneath it. Admittedly, to Ferrari and Porsche, McLaren is a tiny speck on a distant horizon, but let’s remember that speck is an English pirate ship with its sails now properly trimmed.

McLaren 675LT

McLaren has a global dealer and service center network and is running a second shift gearing up for 570S and completing the batch of 500 675LT spiders. Due to added workers and development costs, 2015 will be far less but still in the black.

Carbon-fiber plenum. Though still a 3.8-liter twin-turbo V8, McLaren replaced many of the parts evolving the motor for the 675LT.
McLaren 675LT

McLaren’s biggest development challenge will be differentiating three lines of vehicles based on versions of the same excellent carbon-fiber chassis. Distinct bodywork is the logical and easy step, but McLaren must evolve beyond one twin-turbo V8 in different flavors, an effort that could take years. It’s wise to remember that in the late 1950s and early ‘60s Ferrari was reliant on variants of a 3.0-liter V12. Will McLaren build a tiny sub-2000-lb. elemental sports car for track days? A mid-front-engine four-door coupé/CUV to bring greater profit? How do they top the P1? I would not have said it 18 months ago, but I’m looking forward to witnessing McLaren’s evolution.
 

Batman, The Dark Knight, Join Forces with Automobili Pininfarina: One-Of-One $4 million+ Bruce Wayne B95 Barchetta

The B95 Gotham. This is the Bruce Wayne one-of-one Automobili Pininfarina B95 Barchetta, shown here with the Batman Tumbler in the Los Angeles studio featured in the Warner Bros. Dark Knight Trilogy of 2005-2012, starring Christian Bale.


Bruce Wayne is without question the most swingin’ bachelor in Gotham City, a cerebral guy whose family firm, Wayne Enterprises, develops advanced civilian and military technology, some of which informs the suite of late-night crime-fighting tools employed by Bruce’s deadly alter-ego, Batman, the Dark Knight. First introduced in the 1930s, Bruce Wayne was the original superhero powered by advanced technology.

Human-Machine Interface (HMI) display has custom graphics inspired by the Wayne Enterprises esthetics.

Warner Bros. owns the Batman franchise of DC Comics. Thanks to a century of movie-making, Warner Bros. also owns iconic characters and storylines that lend themselves to branded luxury goods.

Note the tall nacelles that flow backwards from the headrests, like in a 1950s Le Mans race car.

Warner Bros. Discover Global Consumer Products has partnered with Automobili Pininfarina and Relevance International to develop a batch of four one-of-one battery-electric hypercars that reflect the bon vivant lifestyle of Bruce Wayne and the coolly menacing Dark Knight esthetic of Batman.

Butterfly doors. With no roof, simply step into the car, standing on the seat, then brace hands and lower in.

At Quail Lodge this coming week, Automobili Pininfarina will offer one-of-one Batman and Bruce Wayne versions of both its foundational hypercar, the Battista, and its second car, the B95. The “B” stands for Barchetta, which is pronounced BAR-ketta, Italian for little boat, a nickname applied to small, pure Italian roadsters that have no provision for a convertible top. Channel your Inner Bruce Wayne, throw down a few million and you will be the one-of-one owner.

The Gotham Barchetta is finished in Argento Vittorio, silver. Active aero rear wing is like the razor-thin flukes of a carbon-fiber sea creature. It trims aero at higher speeds, and when braking from high speed rises as an airbrake, which in part helps shift the center of gravity rearward so the car squats down with less nosedive, little compression of the front suspension.

Both Battista and B95 employ variations of the 4-motor battery-electric powertrain the boys of Cambiano developed in partnership with everyone’s favorite heir to Nikola Tesla’s Electric Throne, Mate Rimac.

Aero screens adjust in height and angle, to kick airflow up and over the heads of driver and passenger.

Battista and B95’s four electric motors—one for each wheel, with two up front, two in the rear—generate an astounding 1726 lb. ft. of instant-on torque, which equates to roughly 1900 electric horsepower.

This is not Brutalist sculpture. Note the chisel nose, front splitter, tight gap between tire and wheel arch, coke-bottle sides. Note how complex curved surfaces simply “disappear” at their closure.

Automobili Pininfarina CEO and engineering boss Paolo Dellachà finessed the black box controls to put all that power to the ground in a useful and controllable fashion, and guided development of the carbon-fiber backbone and also suspension architecture.

Aero screens adjust in height and angle, to kick airflow up and over the heads of driver and passenger.

Both vehicles can leap from standstill to 60 mph in under two seconds in the Furioso setting, something I experienced back in 2022 at the launch of Battista on the canyons above Malibu. From that experience, I know that a taller man like me can find comfort in both cars, and that the chassis dynamics are stiff but well sorted, in great part because CEO Paolo Dellachà spent years honing his craft with Ferrari and Maserati.

Bruce Wayne signature.

Battista and Barchetta will appeal to those whose minds are open to a world beyond pistons and turbochargers, to those who embrace electric propulsion. Because its lithium-ion battery pack is sandwiched between upper and lower cooling systems, keeping the cells always within optimal temperature range, Battista and Barchetta do not require a dozen radiators with active aero vents and complex cooling channels, as many mega-horsepower piston-driven hypercars do.

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 tires—only the very best, measuring 265/35ZR-20 at the front. Out back, 325/30ZR-21s, which is the biggest tire package developed for the Battista and Barchetta. Note the single center lock holding the forged wheel.

Battista reclaimed the ancient beauty of Pininfarina’s moving sculptures chiseled for so many car companies, including more than a half-century as the preferred body designer for Ferrari. Battista, and the Barchetta, possess the flowing, graceful curves that defined Pininfarina sports cars in the 1950s, ‘60’ and ‘70s, curves that remind of so many of the female athletes we have seen at the Paris Olympics these past few weeks. Those first few decades following World War Two are considered by many the Golden Era of the sports car. But we currently live in a new, tech-infused Golden Era of performance cars and exotic sports cars, a new Belle Epoque of automotive design and engineering.

Automobili Pininfarina Battista can hit 60 mph in less than 2 seconds, thanks to four electric motors providing 1726 lb. ft. of torque.

It remains my opinion that any collector of supercars needs at least one electric hypercar, if only as a measuring stick of all acceleration. Because simply put, no piston-engine hypercar can hope to match the effortlessly violent acceleration of a battery-electric hypercar.

For me, the Battista and Barchetta are both so beautiful, so classically elegant, that they will prove a good return on investment in decades to come. Dave Amantea, who leads Automobili Pininfarina design, has gifted both vehicles with exterior shapes that are best captured with that very old 1960s term: sexy. Amantea has rejected and abandoned the Brutalist forms that are sadly so commonplace these days. Battista and Barchetta have the feminine curves an Italian sports car should possess. From the Golden Age of cinema, think of those Italian bombshells: Claudia Cardinale, Sofia Loren, and Gina Lollabrigida. Yeah, those kinda curves.
 
Battista and Barchetta are perfectly suited to both Bruce Wayne and his glamorous approach to romancing ballerinas and supermodels, as well as the Dark Knight’s deadly late-night action.
 

Gooding Offered This 2006 Final-Year Ford GT And We Delivered Ford GT Backstory

This story was first posted in 2021

Photos: Mike Maez & Courtesy of Gooding

This first appeared on a major dot.com and has been tuned up for posting on my own archive site.

Why does the 2006 Ford GT offered at Gooding & Company’s “Geared” online auction look so much like the original Ford GT40 race car of the 1960s? And will an owner find it a versatile and robust supercar, one to be driven often? And does the GT have a backstory to justify its special place in the collector car market?

Second from left is Andy Slankard, who worked on chassis development. He was once a race driving instructor at Riverside Raceway.

With just a few exceptions like the Taurus SHO and the 5-liter and SVO Mustangs, Ford in North America had been selling “stickers and stripes” pseudo-performance for two decades when Ford marketing boss Bob Rewey of the 1990s and 2000s and his frequent partner in Ford programs, CTO Neil Ressler, started Ford Special Vehicle Team in the 1990s. To maximize creative liberty, Rewey assigned a part-time Ford manager to ride herd on an outsourced group of marketing and PR guys. Housed in Roush Engineering facilities away from mainstream product development, Ford Special Vehicle Engineering (SVE) was comprised of seasoned engineering managers commissioned to develop performance variants for SVT to sell through a subset of Ford dealers. As an interesting side note, this little pirate ship included the solitary (and sometimes cantankerous) engineer who produced Ford police packages, under the glamorous banner DSO, for Dealer Special Order. That old boy was the father of the 1995 Mustang Cobra R. One might say the engineers of SVE were the happy few.

By the early Noughts, SVT and SVE were an established, cohesive organization with several excellent niche performance cars to their credit. They were ready for a much bigger assignment, one that only rarely arrives at a mainstream volume carmaker: a supercar.

John Coletti at Brands Hatch with the 1965 Ford GT40 press car from the Ford of Europe collection. John was the boss. 

SVT was given no ad budget, forcing exploration of alternative means like rifle-shot PR and grassroots owner events, methods now used by all car companies for their niche products. PR methods used by Ferrari, BMW M and others were distilled to fit SVT.

“We scheduled a Product Evaluation day at Brands Hatch for a few years in a row,” says John Coletti, who was the manager of Ford Special Vehicle Engineering. No matter the marketing managers who shifted through, Coletti was the boss and everyone knew it. “During the third year, maybe 2001, word about the event spread throughout Ford of Europe and our supply base. Ford of Europe offered to bring the original GT40 press car from the 1964/65 Le Mans races.”



Ford SVE engineer and hot shoe, Andy Slankard.

“When we were doing the Ford GT program, I had the green GT40 shipped to the States to inspire the vehicle designers to recreate the look of the original car. Interestingly, they shipped the car to the States without carburetor and distributor in the hopes of preventing us Yanks from driving the car around Dearborn,” says Coletti. “They must have been totally unaware that carburetors and distributors for smallblock Ford V8s were a dime a dozen in the States.”

Robert "Bob" Brown driving Work Horse #1 on its very first lap of the Roush facility. Brown left Ford, worked for a supplier, picked up a masters in quality engineering, and served as quality engineer on the GT program.

“Having the car in our Petunia Studio proved invaluable. The original designs that [VP Global Design and Chief Creative Officer] J Mays had Camilo Pardo working on were essentially Audi TT knock-offs. They looked like an upside-down bathtub to me,” says Coletti. “I complained to Ressler and we went to [CEO Jacques] Nasser to share our concern. Jac asked for a review around the first clay. After listening to J Mays spew a lot of bull about how the clay was a modern interpretation of the original design, Jac told J, ‘I want that clay to look like that car,’ pointing to the green GT40 press car. And he reinforced his statement with a closing, ‘J, do you understand what I want?’”

Original casting of the unique GT block. The engine may be derived from the 5.4-liter Modular, but it has many unique parts, including the block no less.

And that’s why the 2004-06 Ford GT designed by Camilo Pardo looks like an 11/10ths scale Ford GT40.

Is the GT a car to drive hard and enjoy? Robert “Bob” Brown served as quality engineer on the Ford GT. He was once my boss on a validation study in Japan performed for the late, great Martin Leach. Thanks to Brown, these Ford GTs are remarkably well put together and in fact there was only one quality error in the tightly compressed development timeframe, which was caught before more than a handful of cars were built. In the case of the Ford GT, quality truly was Job 1.

Ford GTs are not adornments, not trailer queens. The car offered here by Gooding, which was exported to Japan, has a few scars from its life on the road. Ford GTs are meant to be driven.

Quality engineer Bob Brown. This development car was driven cross-country.
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Bob Brown picked up a development GT in Los Angeles and drove it back to Michigan. “I was driving the car cross-country from Los Angeles. Early morning in Iowa, we were looking for breakfast. We were moving along, and an Iowa State trooper gave chase. Rolling roadblock slowed us down. The trooper says that the first speed he clocked was… … …rather high, and I was braking hard. I told him I wasn’t braking hard at all. Turns out the trooper was a great SVT fan, and owned one of our Lightning trucks. Turns out I had been in a 55-mph speed zone and I thought the limit was 70. In the end, he gave me a ticket for 64 mph in a 55 zone, and a $100 fine. He took us to his relative’s restaurant and we finally had breakfast. His patrol car was a Ford Crown Vic, featuring the police package we had developed.” On that same trip, Brown drove the car through the Eisenhower Tunnel on Highway 70, with snow all the way down to Denver. The GT is a real car, meant to be enjoyed.

THe development car after completion of the cross-country dash, sitting in Bob Brown's driveway next to the daily driver F-series favored by Brown.

Any supercar is measured by its powertrain, by its engine. The GT engine may have shared basic geometry of bore, stroke, offset and interface surfaces with the mainstream 5.4-liter V8 with iron block, but there the similarities end. Curt Hill was in charge of powertrain at Ford SVE. “Roush was my engineering team, but we had tremendous support from Ford cylinder block and casting to take advantage of opportunities we could only do on a low-volume block. I recall the casting tech spec proudly proclaim he designed the casting to support 1000 hp. Field experience suggests he over-achieved his own target,” says Hill. Tuner shops have built Ford GTs to produce phenomenal amounts of power and set very high top speeds, so the block and basic architecture have been proven “in the wild.”

Ford GT engines were built on a niche line. Two-man teams built Ford SVT Mustang engines on the Romeo Niche Line. The system was duplicated in Cologne, Germany, to create Aston Martin V12s and in Bridgend, Wales, for Jaguar and Land Rover supercharged V8s. Both engine builders signed a plaque using a metal scribe. Supercharging was most fashionable in the 1990s, guaranteeing excellent horsepower.

“The cylinder head was derived from the [2000] Cobra R, redesigned for improved cooling, strength, structure, and tolerance control. The casting is distinguished with ‘Ford GT’ embossed on the side. To feed the engine we added a second fuel injector for each cylinder. At that time, a single injector that could support the fuel demand at max load, did not have the control at idle to meet emissions. To control the companion injectors, we added a separate module with the necessary drivers and interfaced it back to the EEC IV engine processor,” says Hill. Take that to mean this is a unique remix of Ford pieces, and the head is a unique piece due to the secondary injectors.

Somewhere west of…Davenport, Iowa. The speedometer reading.

“The closest part to carryover from the base 5.4-liter is the crankshaft, which was already a twisted forged crank,” says Hill. These forged cranks were all produced by Ford partner Gerlach-Werke. “We did serious design work on the front of the crank to manage stresses. Pistons, rods, and bearings were all new.”
 
“A major change to lubrication is the dry sump system. That let us lower the engine in car, reduce crankshaft windage, and improve dynamic management of the oil. Cooling performance was significantly upgraded with the aforementioned casting mods and addition of a new high-flow water pump. The supercharger is a Lysholm screw-type compressor, which is much more efficient than the traditional Roots style, common at the time,” says Hill. Twenty years ago, the no-lag turbocharging technology we have in today’s supercars simply did not exist and superchargers had their day in the sun. Superchargers were the best guarantee of meeting horsepower goals. SVE/SVT used them on the second-generation Lightning truck, which should be considered a collectible piece, and also on the “Terminator” version of the Mustang Cobra road cars. If you wonder why the latest Ford GT has turbochargers, it is simply because that engineering breakthroughs of the past decade make it possible. But just as superchargers distinguish the Jaguar Land Rover R car V8s, they bring similar character to the Ford GT engine.

For those who really need to know, to build the library around their Ford GT, Hill recommends an SAE paper that touches on many of the engine design features and processes. It is entitled “2005 Ford GT Powertrain-Supercharged Supercar.” SAE Technical Paper Series 2004-01-1252.

Left to right: Tom Bochenek, parts release engineer; Andy Slankard; Tom Chapman, chassis development engineer. Slankard served as the in-house development driver.

Many people don’t know this, but during the early stages of development, a V10 proposal was explored and subsequently dismissed. Why, you might ask? “The V10 proposal had its appeal, being naturally aspirated, but it had challenges that could have jeopardized the program,” says Hill. “Probably the biggest of which was lack of an engine controller for it. The prototype engine was controlled by two processors, one for each bank. That was not a viable production path. The time and resources to develop a new controller, strategy, and software was not feasible.

Aside from that, it would have been a challenge to comfortably hit the 500-horsepower program target. It made 500 horsepower on dyno, but that was with very aggressive cams, inlet and exhaust losses. By the time it was tuned to meet emissions, I would have been spending a lot of time in meetings explaining my performance shortfall, not to mention the struggles I would have had achieving durability.”

Robert "Bob" Brown served as quality engineer. Here he is in the original Ford GT that served as the press car in the 1960s.

“The supercharged V8, on the other hand, easily made target performance and passed the critical durability test relatively early in the program. It also provides superior driveability due to the supercharged characteristic torque curve,” says Hill. One must only explore YouTube for Ford GTs built by tuner shops to set extremely high top speeds to understand the engine’s robust nature, and fully understand the series of excellent engineering decisions made in a tightly compressed development time frame.
 
John Coletti deserves full credit. After working on a number of successful niche vehicles for SVT, with fairly tight development timeframes, he and his small band of engineering managers knew that to succeed there could be no wild inventions and that in speccing pieces, it was best to err on the side of over-design because there’s little time to recover from mistakes. The resulting car is as robust as any supercar ever made. Thankfully, the overly complicated and somewhat goofy looking GT90 show car was spiked and the choice was simple: either build a 427 Cobra roadster using modern materials and methods, or build a GT40 successor. Ford upper management, meaning Rewey and Ressler, along with Coletti made the right choice. Corvette and Viper already existed, front-engine supercars. Better to build a GT.
 
Without Coletti and Neil Ressler, the car would not have been produced. As I myself experienced in my tenure with SVT, there were forces inside Ford Motor Company that did not want this program or any of the other incredible SVE/SVT programs to succeed. More than anything, the Ford GT demonstrates the need for wise executive leadership capable of aggressively imposing air cover. Th old line about how “the machine gets what the machine wants” certainly applies in most mainstream automotive companies. Special cars only succeed if the senior executives protect the program.

Though Ford SVE was partially dismantled at one point in the Noughts, under CEO Alan Mullally the group was reestablished, and morphed into Ford Performance. I for one hope Ford maintains the group for years to come. A small group of smart, clever pirates can accomplish great things.

Ferrari 488 Spider Test Drive


Ferrari has an advantage over all but a few of its rivals in development of supercars and sports cars: seven unbroken decades of institutional knowledge derived from success in the highest realms of motorsports.

Even in a world as rarefied as open-bodied mid-engine supercars, Maranello’s 488 Spider stands apart. It’s not just the 10-second quarter mile or the 60-mph sprint under three seconds or top speed a few ticks beyond 200. Other supercars deliver equally good measurables with ruthless, exhilarating efficiency.

In 488 Spider, Ferrari melds quantifiable speed with musicality, human factors that make the cockpit, steering and suspension extensions of the driver’s body, computer scripting that’s an extension of the driver’s brain and nervous system, and an almost erotic driving sensibility that engineers from less passionate northern European cultures rarely aspire to. A select few cars are faster, quicker, more expensive, more accomplished on a racetrack for those who indulge such passions, but 488 Spider delivers sensory immersion that leads to a transcendental state of mind—it’s high-speed Zen yoga. 

488’s architecture is framed with Ferrari’s most lucrative market in mind. Tall American males no longer must adopt the Magnum P.I. driving method, top down for adequate headroom. Top up, I had several inches of headroom and I am six foot two+. There’s no hint of claustrophobia as one finds in quirky English trackday cars. A quaterback and perhaps even a linebacker will find enough knee, foot, elbow and shoulder room in a flawless driving position, that low dash and big windscreen opening the cockpit to the road and world ahead.

488 is no luxury vessel, but craftsmanship is to a high order with materials and carefully considered shapes and details that express the Italian understanding of a beautiful life. A companion will revel in every mile of a romantic weekend trip, especially if she participates as copilot. There’s even a passenger-side display screen that can cycle through a wealth of performance data. The front trunk is deep and flat-sided, demanding little sacrifice from a couple familiar with sports car travel. Custom luggage from Ferrari’s atelier will maximize touring capability and thus romantic harmony.

Primary controls sited on or around the steering wheel within fingertip reach define 488’s mission: when you drive, DRIVE. Though an enormous tachometer is dead ahead to keep you mindful of the redline, the engine is sewing machine smooth, never feeling or sounding strained on the way to 8500 rpm. The red LEDs built into the top of the steering wheel rim are the best warning of redline’s rapid approach, illuminating left to right.

Sound and visuals are pure Scuderia drama when ripping up a freeway onramp to speeds over 100 mph in about seven seconds—every onramp is your playground of the moment. Sightlines over the low dash, steeply raked hood, and swelling fenders provide subliminal connection to the steering and suspension, and the road rushing under your feet heightens excitement. Outrageously low and exotic exterior design have only heightened function, not compromised it. THis car is exotic to enhance the driving experience, not to aid curb appeal.

Before 488’s arrival, talk of a turbocharged successor to the naturally aspirated 458 Italia provoked anxiety. Thanks to nearly instant-on twin turbos the 3.9-liter V8 gushes with easily exploitable torque yet shrieks, yips, and yelps in classic Ferrari style. After 30 minutes in this Blu Corsa 488 Spider, a friend who owned a 458 Italia for several years said he’s inspired to own one more mid-engine Ferrari. 488 has about 90 horsepower more than Italia, a significant jump. Of far greater importance, 488 has about 150 lb.-ft. more torque arriving 3000 revs lower than in Italia’s 4.5-liter V8. This engine is far more flexible, torque and horsepower far easier to exploit, to apply.

Engine tone changes substantially at 3400 rpm, and from that point to redline, 488 can get the jump on almost any other car. What little of Italia’s Maranello Philharmonic Orchestra was lost to the turbos has bought shocking roll-on acceleration. The only things quicker are hypercars, or trackday specials that are brutal sweatboxes that grow tiresome after 20 minutes.

Ferrari’s computer geeks are exemplary, due special commendation. Manettino selects the scripting, allowing several performance personalities ranging from daily commute to track day sans stability control. Twist Manettino full left to “Wet” and 488 engages in a refined conversation—only clear, useful information reaching the steering wheel and seat-of-pants. No junk, jangle, vibration or confusion. Maranello’s engineers fully exploit the potential of adaptive dampers. Plush and supple in Wet, 488 can execute short commutes in the savagery of Los Angeles street and freeway traffic. [In later years, Ferrari developed a unique setting in Manettino for very supple suspension settings, a big help when covering miles on a long day.]

Move to “Sport,” put your boot in it while paddleshifting through the gears, and 488 ever so slightly spins the tires and sidesteps into second gear with the subtlety of a waltzing master, all without the least hint of shock or banging from the gearbox. This lightweight 661 horsepower engine is a musical instrument, a French horn with string accompaniment.

488 delivers quantifiable performance but also the dance, symphony, stirring of the loins, the mind-meld connection. Italians understand that it’s not about merely going fast—that is for racecars designed to a singular purpose. It’s about how you go fast and how you feel upon arrival.

Complex shapes and surface development of 488’s body are all resolved, and border on pure erotica. Curves, creases, details, surface tension, it all works. Design up front may be guided by aerodynamics, yet origins trace at least to the Magnum P.I. 308, and even to the wellspring of mid-engine Ferrari sporting cars, the more voluptuous SP Dino sports-racers of the early 1960s. Shapes that begin in the door mid-section, twisting and rising into the side intake pods, roof pillars and rear fenders, are unparalleled in the automotive world. Abstract industrial sculpture…Humphrey-Lahti and Henry Moore meet the wind tunnel.

I first drove a 488 GTB at Pebble Beach almost two years ago, and 90 minutes behind the wheel left me in a heightened mental state, in an orbit separate from the people milling about me at Casa Ferrari. It’s just that good. [Damn shame the videographer assigned to work with me didn’t understand how to shoot a car in motion, but we live and learn.] During our week with 488 Spider, my lovely attorney and I attended the LA Opera’s performance of Mozart’s comedic “A Night in the Seraglio.” Ferraris and Mozart’s finest compositions share much that sets them apart: unmistakable within five measures, fostering a sense of childlike wonder shot through with zest and verve that sets the heart dancing, emotions soaring with a near-narcotic rush before settling to sustained, blissful well-being. Ferrari 488 Spider is a singular automotive experience.

Klemantaski Collection Issues Racing Fine Art Book

Auto racing photography was effectively invented and defined by Louis Klemantaski, who was born in the Manchurian city of Harbin, far from the center of the racing world. Louis’s father, Jacques, had hoped to build his fortune in Manchuria by exporting soybeans and importing Willys-Knight and Overland cars. In support of his father’s efforts, Louis was driving by the age of eight, and in 1922 received a “Brownie” box camera for his tenth birthday. The die was cast.

Of Polish ethnicity but a citizen of Great Britain, Jacques sent his son back to England for his formal education, at Kings College. But once he discovered auto racing, Louis spent less and less time at school and more time photographing cars. A severe ankle injury on a motorcycle in 1933 and a lack of funds ended his racing ambitions. By the age of 21, he had turned to his early passion, photography.

Klemantaski mastered and built upon the photographic techniques of Jacques-Henri Lartigue, whose experiments in the early 20th Century are the foundation of action photography.

From 1936 to 1974, Klemantaski was a fixture at Grand Prix events, Le Mans and the Mille Miglia, so much so that editors who had trouble spelling his name published his photos with the byline “Himself.” Klemantaski’s fine manners and signature appearance—luxuriant coiffure, gleaming goatee, and natty clothes—made him a much beloved character and engaging dinner guest.

Though racing today remains a dangerous sport, with death or serious injury a possibility in spite of decades of safety engineering and medical advances, students of history know it is not the blood sport that existed from the Teens into the Seventies, when skilled drivers died far too frequently. In those days of lax safety precautions, Klemantaski could be found at the verge of a racetrack, snapping photos mere feet away from cars moving at high speed.

Without a GoPro to place inside a racecar, Klemantaski was body and soul part of the top echelons of motorsports, and he was fearless. On five occasions he strapped himself into the passenger seat of a thundering Fifties sports-racing car to serve as navigator in the Mille Miglia, the famed 1000-mile open-road sprint from Brescia to Rome and back. As navigator to Ferrari piloto Peter Collins, Klemantaski snapped Enzo Ferrari’s favorite motorsports photograph, seen at the top of this post. Working from the cockpit, in harm’s way with little more than a cardboard polo helmet for protection, Klemantaski captured some of the most iconic of all motor racing images.
In 1989 Louis Klemantaski sold his body of work to Peter Sachs, who established the Klemantaski Collection, a private archive that over the past 25 years has purchased, documented, digitized and preserved the works of more than a dozen of the best European and American race photographers of the 20th Century.

Museum-quality books have been a specialty of the Collection since the 1990 publication of Klemantaski & Ferrari, and a new book arrives just barely in time for Christmas 2014. Over more than two decades, the Collection has refined the business metrics of niche publishing, delivering exquisite books to a small body of discerning collectors who appreciate timeless graphic design, impeccable historic research, and high standards of printing and binding. They’re not produced in pursuit of great profit, but Klemantaski books will not land in the bargain bin at Costco or Wal-Mart. To have them on your bookshelf is an indication that you know, you understand. As with Ferraris, only a few are ever made.

Aptly titled Klemantaski — Master Motorsports Photographer, this new edition is dedicated primarily to photos not previously published. For text, captions, and another layer of fact-checking research, the Collection engaged British motor racing historian Paul Parker.

The book includes more than 300 black & white and color images beautifully spread over a generous 272 pages. We have posted a few Klemantaski photos from this new edition, plus one that’s a personal favorite, at the top of this post.

Find the book here, at www.klemcoll.com.

Can Lotus Blossom Again

NOTE: A version of this story appeared in Forbes in February 9, 2015.

Jean-Marc Gales, the newly recruited CEO of Group Lotus Plc., arrived in Norfolk, England last May with a simple but daunting mission: to restore the once mighty British automaker as a supercar superpower.

Lotus Evora at Hethel, England, development track.

For the past few decades Lotus has been seriously stalled while its main rivals–Ferrari, Porsche, McLaren–have shot past them in auto racing, production vehicles, engineering services and profit. The past two years alone Lotus has seen nearly $400 million in losses. Since 1998, Lotus has had only four profitable years.

The 52-year-old Gales began his career leading Volkswagen fleet sales, followed by a stint managing Mercedes global marketing before he claimed the presidency of Peugeot in 2009. An acute technocrat steeped in the hard business of selling large numbers of vehicles, at midcareer Gales has a surprising sense for the entrepreneurial. And apparently a fearless heart.

Lotus is based in Hethel, England, built on a decommissioned World War II bomber base.

Walking the Lotus facility last May, Gales performed combat triage, asking his engineers for products to execute and market within a year. His goal: to unveil the next generation of Lotus vehicles at the Geneva auto show in March of 2015.

With the engineers revving, Gales shook the financials. “It required painful decisions,” he admits. “It does not take 1,250 employees to produce 1,296 cars–an unsustainable condition.” He let go of 25% of the workforce.

Gales then put on his salesman’s hat. “The dealer network was extremely spotty. We had no dealer in Paris, no dealer in London, no dealer in Cannes or Milan, Abu Dhabi–no dealers where there are people with the money to buy our cars.”

He signed up 25 new dealers and by year’s end will have another 50. Voting with their own money, dealers have agreed to buy vehicles and spare parts for cash, and self-fund build-out of their dealerships, boosting Lotus’ cash flow. “The dealers are so confident that they are carrying the investment themselves,” Gales explains. “Dealer network expansion is essential for driving volume above 3000 cars a year. The average Lotus dealer, and it is prudent to stick with an average here, sells 20 new Lotus cars and around $80,000 in spare parts a year.”

Why are dealers willing to put up cash for a brand few people beyond sports car enthusiasts recognize or understand? A brand that has swayed from one financial disaster to another most of its existence? The power of mythology, the promise of new products, a changing regulatory landscape that demands more efficient vehicles, and a no-nonsense CEO.

Mythology begins with Anthony Colin Bruce Chapman (his four initials are incorporated into the Lotus badge), who founded the company in 1952 in a London horse barn. By 1963 Lotus had soundly beaten Ferrari, Porsche, Cooper and BRM to secure its first of six Formula One World Drivers and seven Constructors championships. Lotus also introduced rear-engine design to the Indy 500, eventually winning in 1965, forever changing American motor sports. Always the entrepreneur, in 1968 Chapman brought cigarette sponsorship to Grand Prix racing, which helped make him a millionaire and changed the face of all motor sports forever. The team’s last major success came in 1978, with Mario Andretti at the wheel of a Lotus Grand Prix racer that perfected the concept of “ground effects,” the car an inverted wing that literally sucked itself onto the track, allowing it to corner at shockingly high speeds. Andretti and Lotus claimed World Championships that year.

Since the 1960s, Lotus has been headquartered at a former RAF bomber base in Norfolk, not far from the English Channel. The handling course that has given rise to so many balanced chassis with brainwave steering includes portions of the old bomber runways. Since the 1960s, Lotus has been headquartered at a former RAF bomber base in Norfolk, not far from the English Channel. The handling course that has given rise to so many balanced chassis includes portions of the old bomber runways.

Away from the track, Lotus developed giant slayers, innovative but quirky sports cars built on the principles of Colin Chapman: Simplify, then make it lighter. Always diminutive, and with rare exception powered by engines first from Ford, then GM and now Toyota, Lotus cars were all about brain wave steering and handling.

Despite some renown in the late 1970s–James Bond’s amphibious Esprit in The Spy Who Loved Me–by 1982 the company was selling only a few hundred cars a year and was propped up by an IP agreement with Toyota made not long before Chapman’s death at age 54. In spite of new-found income generated by providing big car companies with engineering services, much as current Formula One teams McLaren and Williams are starting to do, without the founding entrepreneur guiding the company, Lotus faded fast.

After seven years of ownership GM sold its stake in 1993. In do-or-die fashion, Lotus developed Elise, the first production car built of bonded aluminum. Sheets and spars of aluminum are pressed, twisted and extruded into precise shapes, then chemically “glued” or “bonded” together. A form of industrial origami, the process results in strong, lightweight cars.

Elise was a lightning bolt 20 years ago, so stunning that Ford engaged Lotus to develop the vertical horizontal (VH) architecture that underpins all Aston Martins. But until now Lotus lacked the resources to mutate its own car, the mid-engine Evora, into a range of products.

Prior to Gales there was another bold attempt to revive the company, but it quickly failed. In 2010 Lotus’ Malaysian parent company, Proton, appointed former Red Bull and Ferrari executive Dany Bahar as CEO. Bahar recruited a Mercedes-AMG powertrain engineer, and designers from Ferrari. A flashy marketing executive accustomed to Red Bull’s outsize marketing budgets, Bahar had a plan long on bravado and Central European sensibilities, but short of achievable goals. Bahar correctly identified that matters had to change, but his tenure ended in 2012 with acrimony and a flurry of legal battles. Soon after Proton was absorbed by its Malaysian rival, DRB-HICOM. “The financial situation was dire for several years,” Gales admits, “with losses of $255 million in 2012-13 and $108 million in 2013-14. We had to take action to quickly turn this situation around. It was part of my brief from the owners, DRB-HICOM and Proton as well as to become operationally cash flow positive in 2015 and profitable in 2016.” Giving cheer to sports car purists, Gales is adamant that Lotus will remain a rare analog holdout in a world of computer-controlled supercars that defy the laws of physics. Like Elise before it, the Evora engages the driver in an intimate conversation between car and road. Like every Lotus, it’s a “momentum” car, meaning once speed is built up, don’t waste it by slowing down too much for corners. Behind the wheel, any cyclist or skier will quickly understand Evora’s supple yet tenacious handling.

Gales is focused on fully reviving the road car business first, then turning to the company’s long-time engineering consultancy. “Traditionally, Lotus Engineering has always been the larger part of the Lotus business,” Gales says, “but more recently we have been more selective with the amount and type of work that we have undertaken. The consultancy business now represents 10% of total turnover. We do not exclude that it will grow again, but the priority for the next few years is on Lotus cars, which is the best advertisement for our consultancy division. Clients are coming to us for what our cars are globally renowned for, vehicle dynamics, lightweight engineering and efficiency.”

Though Gales is coy about the vehicles he’ll announce in Geneva, it’s reasonable to expect a dramatically revamped Evora that’s lighter and significantly more powerful. Gales claims that Lotus has also reduced build costs by 10%. When pressed about the dull engine sound of the current 2014 Evora–one only hears the slight whirring of the supercharger that sits atop the Toyota V6–Gales responded, emphatically: very soon Evora will howl with the best sports cars.

And the Evora that will likely bow at Geneva will come to America. “We are fully committed to the North American market and will produce a 2016 model year Evora that will be fully compliant for the USA. The North American market is vitally important for us and we are expanding our dealer network and will grow our sales volumes in the future.”

Track specials like this Evora GT4 are a small but important part of the Lotus business plan. THeir exceptional on-track handling and steering are an advertisement for Group Lotus’s engineering consultancy.
Track specials like this Evora GT4 are a small but important part of the Lotus business plan. Their exceptional on-track handling and steering are an advertisement for Group Lotus’s engineering consultancy.

To boost sales volumes, the new Evora–which won’t be released in the U.S. until late 2015–may become the basis of a new coupe-like CUV, though when pressed on the topic Gales grew entirely silent. More radical still, there could be a mid-front-engine, rear-drive four-door sedan, though any such car will be years away.

With multiple flavors of Evora, a CUV and a smattering of track-only hyper-Lotuses to market to members of private racing clubs like Thermal in Palm Springs, Gales is confident he can lift Lotus’ global sales to 10,000 by 2018. Considering Lotus barely sold 1000 cars in 2013, and fewer than 2000 cars in 2014, it’s a bold prediction. Lotus will not match Ferrari or Porsche for annual or per-unit profit, but the company is sustainable at 3000 cars per year. “A break even point depends upon many variables, says Gales, “but we definitely have the intention of being profitable by producing and selling over 3000 cars per year in 2016.”

When asked why a former president of Peugeot would move to often-gloomy Norfolk to run an advanced engineering firm that also crafts exotically simple sports cars, Gales is clear: “For the challenge,” he says. “I see a huge amount of potential for the company, and I know we can realize this potential. Also, I have always loved Lotus, ever since I was a child and my father took me to the Lotus dealer in Luxembourg. I still have the brochures from that visit.”

A Shining Silver Arrow: Mercedes-AMG GT S

NOTE: A version of this first appeared in Forbes Life print edition, Fall 2014.

Mercedes-AMG GT S. Photos courtesy of Mercedes-AMG.

With the Mercedes-AMG GT S, the boys in Affalterbach have created a lighter, shorter and more compact successor to the gargantuan SLS. But the signature Mercedes proportions are still there: a gaping maw, a long hood and an upright windshield, all flowing into a teardrop roof and tail. Formed from aluminum and magnesium and tipping the scales at under 3,500 pounds, the 503hp GT S should prove a nimble hunter, ready to chase down those rear-engined sports cars from the other end of Stuttgart.

Its compact 4.0-liter twin-turbo V8 mounted front-mid-engine balances the 7-speed dual-clutch transaxle hanging between the rear wheels. Several distinct settings for suspension and powertrain response can tailor this Gran Turismo Sport for any of life’s automotive pleasures, from a day at the track to high-speed loping across open terrain–even two people and luggage off for a beautiful weekend. Perhaps best of all, it has old-fashioned hydraulic-assist steering, ensuring exceptional feel and communication.

As a measure of the intense competition the car faces from Porsche and the Audi R8 V10, AMG is bringing the big gun first, the more potent GT S arriving next Spring, with the less extreme, less expensive GT version to follow.

Gone are the gullwing doors of the SLS, but this Silver Arrow still flies true.

Mercedes-AMG GT S
Layout: Front-mid-engine, rear-drive
Engine: 4.0-liter DOHC V8, Twin Turbo
Horsepower: 503
Torque: 479 lb. ft.
Transmission: 7-speed dual-clutch transaxle
Top Speed (est.): 193 MPH
0-60 MPH (est.): 3.7 seconds
Curb weight (est.): 3462 lbs.
Available: Spring 2015

Mercedes-AMG GT S.